<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 3 Reasons to Read Freud	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://dgozli.com/3-reasons-to-read-freud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://dgozli.com/3-reasons-to-read-freud/</link>
	<description>Reviews &#124; Interviews &#124; Updates</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2020 14:56:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Brad Jesness		</title>
		<link>https://dgozli.com/3-reasons-to-read-freud/#comment-732</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad Jesness]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2020 16:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dgozli.com/?p=2032#comment-732</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://dgozli.com/3-reasons-to-read-freud/#comment-731&quot;&gt;Brad Jesness&lt;/a&gt;.

P.S.  Although Freud was clearly not correct with some things, he was FAR more correct than people know **.  See: The Scientific Credibility of Freud&#039;s Theories and Therapy by Fisher and Greenberg (1985 and 1977).  It was hailed as by the Library Journal as one of the 10 best books in Psychology in 1977.   

** There is something much like the Oedipal/Electra complex; it is explainable by good cognitive developmental stage theories (i.e. explainable in modern terms).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://dgozli.com/3-reasons-to-read-freud/#comment-731">Brad Jesness</a>.</p>
<p>P.S.  Although Freud was clearly not correct with some things, he was FAR more correct than people know **.  See: The Scientific Credibility of Freud&#8217;s Theories and Therapy by Fisher and Greenberg (1985 and 1977).  It was hailed as by the Library Journal as one of the 10 best books in Psychology in 1977.   </p>
<p>** There is something much like the Oedipal/Electra complex; it is explainable by good cognitive developmental stage theories (i.e. explainable in modern terms).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brad Jesness		</title>
		<link>https://dgozli.com/3-reasons-to-read-freud/#comment-731</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad Jesness]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2020 16:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dgozli.com/?p=2032#comment-731</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I greatly enjoyed and greatly benefited from reading a lot of Freud (phenomenology, biological principles, foundations -- all good with Freud).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I greatly enjoyed and greatly benefited from reading a lot of Freud (phenomenology, biological principles, foundations &#8212; all good with Freud).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
