<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>critical psychology &#8211; Davood Gozli</title>
	<atom:link href="https://dgozli.com/category/critical-psychology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://dgozli.com</link>
	<description>Reviews &#124; Interviews &#124; Updates</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 19:01:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>On Hijacking Science (E. E. Gantt &#038; R. N. Williams)</title>
		<link>https://dgozli.com/on-hijacking-science-gantt-williams/</link>
					<comments>https://dgozli.com/on-hijacking-science-gantt-williams/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davood Gozli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2021 12:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[book review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critical psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history of psychology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dgozli.com/?p=2778</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have written a review and summary of this book on Medium. In future posts, I am planning to select specific passages from the book and explore questions regarding science, scientific communication, and scientism. This slim, engaging, and valuable book belongs in the book series,&#160;Advances in Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, edited by Brent D. Slife....]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://dgozli.com/on-hijacking-science-gantt-williams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Experimental Psychology of Culture</title>
		<link>https://dgozli.com/experimental-cognitive-psychology-of-culture/</link>
					<comments>https://dgozli.com/experimental-cognitive-psychology-of-culture/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davood Gozli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 03:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cognitive psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critical psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discourse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dgozli.com/?p=2084</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It is, for understandable reasons, difficult to hear, &#8216;What you&#8217;re doing is not what you think/say it is.&#8217; A message like this is not likely to evoke a friendly response; it is unlikely to be seen as a friendly remark. In essence, the message does not deny the activity—&#8217;Yes, you are doing something&#8217;—but rather denies...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://dgozli.com/experimental-cognitive-psychology-of-culture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversations &#038; Positions</title>
		<link>https://dgozli.com/conversations-positioning/</link>
					<comments>https://dgozli.com/conversations-positioning/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davood Gozli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 05:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[critical psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Descriptive Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discourse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Psychology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dgozli.com/?p=1896</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We shouldn’t think about conversations only as exchanges of information. Nor should we think about our positions in conversations only as givers and receivers of information. Too much emphasis on information overshadows the fact that our position in conversations are also tied with power, rights, and duties. For example, in a father-son conversation, we could...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://dgozli.com/conversations-positioning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jeff Sugarman on Psychologism</title>
		<link>https://dgozli.com/jeff-sugarman-on-psychologism/</link>
					<comments>https://dgozli.com/jeff-sugarman-on-psychologism/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davood Gozli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2020 07:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[critical psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history of psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophical psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy of science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theoretical Psychology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dgozli.com/?p=1890</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In his Chapter, An Historical Turn in Theoretical &#38; Philosophical Psychology, Jeff Sugarman (2019) begins by distinguishing three different approach to historiography (borrowing from Nikolas Rose). Among the three approaches, he introduces and adopts &#8216;critical history&#8217;. One of the aims of critical history is to explicate styles of reasoning that are operating in the background...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://dgozli.com/jeff-sugarman-on-psychologism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Systems &#038; Theories Class (Fall 2019)</title>
		<link>https://dgozli.com/systems-theories-class-fall-2019/</link>
					<comments>https://dgozli.com/systems-theories-class-fall-2019/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davood Gozli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 07:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[critical psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teaching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theoretical Psychology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dgozli.com/?p=1790</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What was unique about this semester: We discussed Brian Haig&#8217;s (2014) Investigating the Psychological World. A few students got involved with the book, but I think most students focused only on the chapter they were responsible for. I kept returning to the question, Why did Haig write this book? (especially given that psychological researchers don&#8217;t...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://dgozli.com/systems-theories-class-fall-2019/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Arguments (Part 3)</title>
		<link>https://dgozli.com/on-arguments-part-3/</link>
					<comments>https://dgozli.com/on-arguments-part-3/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davood Gozli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 08:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critical psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teaching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dgozli.com/?p=1768</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In the first post in this series, I wrote, &#8220;a shopping list is not an argument&#8221;. This is a useful point of reference for us in understanding arguments, and the practice of argumentation. Now in this post we want to imagine a way in which a shopping list can turn into an argument. Or, at...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://dgozli.com/on-arguments-part-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Arguments (Part 2)</title>
		<link>https://dgozli.com/on-arguments-part-2/</link>
					<comments>https://dgozli.com/on-arguments-part-2/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davood Gozli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019 13:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cognitive psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critical psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teaching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dgozli.com/?p=1754</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It was the winter of 2010. My thesis supervisor and I were walking along Otonobee river on the beautiful Trent University campus. The campus looks more beautiful and more dreamy now in my memories, and I am sure its beauty has increased with our distance in time. I told him about my plan for post-graduate...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://dgozli.com/on-arguments-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Psychology without People</title>
		<link>https://dgozli.com/psychology-absence-of-people-raeff-2019/</link>
					<comments>https://dgozli.com/psychology-absence-of-people-raeff-2019/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davood Gozli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2019 03:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[critical psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy of science]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dgozli.com/?p=1479</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In a recent general critique of Psychology, Catherine Raeff (2019) follows up on Michael Billig&#8217;s (2013) analysis, pointing out that psychological science, in its currently dominant style, is a science of things and not of people. In brief, it is a science&#8211;or a collection of sciences&#8211;in which people (supposedly the primary targets of investigation) are...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://dgozli.com/psychology-absence-of-people-raeff-2019/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Margins and Vitality</title>
		<link>https://dgozli.com/margins-of-vitality/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davood Gozli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 02:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critical psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dgozli.com/?p=1162</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A good friend asked me a series of questions, which were meant to act as writing probes. One of them was: &#8220;Is psychology a dead-end or is it waiting to be born?&#8221;. I decided to write an answer to it, because it is the only question on his list that bothered me. I sensed an urge to avoid...]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Notes in Feb 2018</title>
		<link>https://dgozli.com/letters-from-an-epicurean-5/</link>
					<comments>https://dgozli.com/letters-from-an-epicurean-5/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davood Gozli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 12:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critical psychology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dgozli.com/?p=980</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You might not be interested in politics, but politics is interested in you. Academic politics is as unavoidable as politics in any other communal domain. Your withdrawal, your inaction, your compliance will help perpetuate existing structures, unexamined positions, and rent seekers. At first glance, it may seem like the stakes are not high. Ego strokes seem...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://dgozli.com/letters-from-an-epicurean-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
