<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>philosophy of science &#8211; Davood Gozli</title>
	<atom:link href="https://dgozli.com/category/philosophy-of-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://dgozli.com</link>
	<description>Reviews &#124; Interviews &#124; Updates</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2025 22:48:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Seminar Announcement: History &#038; Philosophy of Psychology (2025)</title>
		<link>https://dgozli.com/seminar-announcement-history-philosophy-of-psychology-2025/</link>
					<comments>https://dgozli.com/seminar-announcement-history-philosophy-of-psychology-2025/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davood Gozli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 17:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[history of psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy of science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History and Philosophy of Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seminar]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dgozli.com/?p=4394</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I will be offering this 10-week seminar starting in the last week of September. It’s the first time I’m running something like this outside of an institution, and I think I’ll only be able to do it once a year. During this course, we’ll be addressing some of the foundational questions in general psychology as...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://dgozli.com/seminar-announcement-history-philosophy-of-psychology-2025/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interview with Sebastjan Vörös: Minds, Worlds &#038; Non-Duality</title>
		<link>https://dgozli.com/interview-with-sebastjan-voros-minds-worlds-non-duality/</link>
					<comments>https://dgozli.com/interview-with-sebastjan-voros-minds-worlds-non-duality/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davood Gozli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 23:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy of science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Francisco Varela]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-duality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phenomenology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sebastjan Vörös]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dgozli.com/?p=3863</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In an interview with Davood Gozli, Sebastjan Vörös reflects on the motive to connect science and philosophy, exploring life's dynamic essence, challenging dualistic and mechanistic views, inspired by thinkers like Francisco Varela, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Georges Canguilhem.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://dgozli.com/interview-with-sebastjan-voros-minds-worlds-non-duality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Is Science? Science versus Scientism</title>
		<link>https://dgozli.com/what-is-science-science-versus-scientism/</link>
					<comments>https://dgozli.com/what-is-science-science-versus-scientism/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davood Gozli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 15:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Discourse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy of science]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dgozli.com/?p=2765</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The 2018 volume, On Hijacking Science, edited by Edwin E. Gantt and Richard N. Williams, provides a good starting point in thinking about general questions about science, e.g., What is science? What are the differences, if any, between science and scientism? Why are there tensions between a scientific (scientistic) worldview and those grounded in older...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://dgozli.com/what-is-science-science-versus-scientism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jeff Sugarman on Psychologism</title>
		<link>https://dgozli.com/jeff-sugarman-on-psychologism/</link>
					<comments>https://dgozli.com/jeff-sugarman-on-psychologism/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davood Gozli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2020 07:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[critical psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history of psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophical psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy of science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theoretical Psychology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dgozli.com/?p=1890</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In his Chapter, An Historical Turn in Theoretical &#38; Philosophical Psychology, Jeff Sugarman (2019) begins by distinguishing three different approach to historiography (borrowing from Nikolas Rose). Among the three approaches, he introduces and adopts &#8216;critical history&#8217;. One of the aims of critical history is to explicate styles of reasoning that are operating in the background...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://dgozli.com/jeff-sugarman-on-psychologism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Brad Jesness&#8217;s Review</title>
		<link>https://dgozli.com/brad-jesness-review/</link>
					<comments>https://dgozli.com/brad-jesness-review/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davood Gozli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2019 11:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[philosophical psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy of science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dgozli.com/?p=1719</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Here is a link to Brad Jesness&#8217;s review of my book, which I read with interest. The review is posted on ResearchGate as a “comment”, and I decided to respond to it here for the sake of convenience. Brad (and others) could continue the thread either here or on RG. I wasn&#8217;t expecting much of...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://dgozli.com/brad-jesness-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video Series on Brian Haig&#8217;s (2014) Book</title>
		<link>https://dgozli.com/video-series-on-brian-haigs-2014-book/</link>
					<comments>https://dgozli.com/video-series-on-brian-haigs-2014-book/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davood Gozli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[book review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy of science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teaching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theoretical Psychology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dgozli.com/?p=1701</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am making a video series (&#8220;study guide&#8221;) about Brian Haig&#8216;s Book, Investigating the Psychological World: Scientific Method in the Behavioral Sciences. We are reading the book with my students in the course, Systems &#38; Theories in Psychology. Most of the students in that class are in their final year and are doing a final-year...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://dgozli.com/video-series-on-brian-haigs-2014-book/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Psychology without People</title>
		<link>https://dgozli.com/psychology-absence-of-people-raeff-2019/</link>
					<comments>https://dgozli.com/psychology-absence-of-people-raeff-2019/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davood Gozli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2019 03:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[critical psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy of science]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dgozli.com/?p=1479</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In a recent general critique of Psychology, Catherine Raeff (2019) follows up on Michael Billig&#8217;s (2013) analysis, pointing out that psychological science, in its currently dominant style, is a science of things and not of people. In brief, it is a science&#8211;or a collection of sciences&#8211;in which people (supposedly the primary targets of investigation) are...]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://dgozli.com/psychology-absence-of-people-raeff-2019/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
