in press

Gozli, D. (in press). Experimental psychology and distortions of common sense. In T. G. Lindstad, E. Stänicke, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Respect for Reasoning; Jan Smedslund’s Legacy for Psychology. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.


Ansorge, U., Gozli, D.G., & Goller, F. (2019). Investigating the contribution of task and response repetitions to the sequential modulations of attentional cueing effects. Psychological Research, 83, 1251–1268. [pdf]

Gozli, D. (2019). Experimental psychology and human agency. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

Gozli, D.G. & Gao, C.J. (2019). Hope, exploration, and equilibrated action schemes (commentary). Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 42, E41.

Huffman, G., Gozli, D.G., Hommel, B., & Pratt, J. (2019). Response preparation, response selection difficulty, and response-outcome learning. Psychological Research, 83, 247–257. [pdf]

Mammen, J. & Gozli, D. (2019). Rebellion, theory, and dialogue: An interview with Jens Mammen. Human Arenas, 2, 186-199. [pdf]


Amer, T., Gozli, D.G., & Pratt, J. (2018). Biasing spatial attention with semantic information: An event coding approach. Psychological Research, 82, 840–858. [pdf]

Gozli, D.G. & Deng, W. (2018). Building blocks of psychology: On remaking the unkept promises of early schools. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 52, 1-24. [pdf]

Gozli, D.G. & Dolcini, N. (2018). Reaching into the unknown: Actions, goal hierarchies, and explorative agency. Frontiers in Psychology, 9: 266. [pdf]

Gozli, D.G., Lockwood, P., Chasteen, A.L., & Pratt, J. (2018). Spatial metaphors in thinking about other people. Visual Cognition, 26, 313-333. [pdf]


Gozli, D.G. (2017). Behaviour versus performance: The veiled commitment of experimental psychology. Theory & Psychology, 27, 741-758. [pdf]

Gozli, D.G. (2017). Progress in first-person method: A few steps forward, a few steps back (commentary). Constructivist Foundations, 12, 205-6. [pdf]

Gozli, D.G. (2017). The lackluster role of misperceptions in an enactivist paradigm (commentary). Constructivist Foundations, 13, 133-5. [pdf]

Hibberd, F.J. & Gozli, D.G. (2017). Psychology’s fragmentation and neglect of foundational assumptions: An interview with Fiona J. Hibberd. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 13, 366-74. [pdf]


Gozli, D.G. (2016). Phenomenology as critique, discovery, and justification (commentary). Constructivist Foundations, 11, 389-391. [pdf]

Gozli, D.G. & Ansorge, U. (2016). Action selection as a guide for visual attention. Visual Cognition, 24, 38-50. [pdf]

Gozli, D.G., Aslam, H., & Pratt, J. (2016). Visuospatial cueing by self-caused features: Orienting of attention and action-outcome associative learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 459-467. [pdf]

Gozli, D.G., Huffman, G., & Pratt, J. (2016). Acting and anticipating: Impact of outcome-compatible distractor depends on response selection efficiency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 42, 1601-1614. [pdf]

Gozli, D.G., Pratt, J., Martin, K.Z., & Chasteen, A.L. (2016).  Implied spatial meaning and visuospatial bias: Conceptual processing influences processing of visual targets and distractors.  PLoS ONE, 11: e0150928. [pdf]


Constable, M.D., Pratt, J., Gozli, D.G., & Welsh, T.N. (2015). Do you see what I see? Co-actor posture modulates visual processing in joint tasks. Visual Cognition, 23, 699-719. [pdf]

Huffman, G., Gozli, D.G., Welsh, T.N., & Pratt, J. (2015). Hand position influences perceptual grouping. Experimental Brain Research, 233, 2627-2634. [pdf]

Pratt, J., Taylor, J.E.T., & Gozli, D.G. (2015). Action and attention. In E.F. Risko, J. Fawcett, & A. Kingstone (Eds.). Handbook of Attention (pp. 325-348). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [pdf]

Taylor, J.E.T., Gozli, D.G., Chan, D., Huffman, G., & Pratt, J. (2015). A touchy subject: advancing the modulated visual pathways account of altered vision near the hand. Translational Neuroscience, 6, 1-7. [pdf]


Chow, A., Gozli, D.G., & Pratt, J. (2014). Examining the locus of the attentional attraction effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 2389-2397. [pdf]

Gozli, D.G., Ardron, J., & Pratt, J. (2014). Reduced visual feature binding in the near-hand space. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 1308-1317. [pdf]

Gozli, D.G., Bavelier, D., & Pratt, J. (2014). The effect of action video game playing on sensorimotor learning: Evidence from a movement tracking task. Human Movement Science, 38, 152-162. [pdf]

Gozli, D.G., Moskowitz, J.B., & Pratt, J. (2014). Visual attention to features by associative learning. Cognition, 133, 488-501. [pdf]

Gozli, D.G., Wilson, K.E., & Ferber, S. (2014). The spatially asymmetric cost of working memory load on visual perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 580-591. [pdf]


Goodhew, S.C., Gozli, D.G., Ferber, S., & Pratt, J. (2013). Reduced temporal fusion in the near-hand space. Psychological Science, 24, 891-900. [pdf]

Gozli, D.G., Chasteen, A.L. & Pratt, J. (2013). The cost and benefit of implicit spatial cues for visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 1028-1046. [pdf]

Gozli, D.G., Chow, A., Chasteen, A.L., & Pratt, J. (2013). Valence and vertical space: Saccade trajectory deviations reveal metaphorical spatial activation. Visual Cognition, 21, 628-646. [pdf]

Gozli, D.G., Goodhew, S.C., Moskowitz, J.B., & Pratt, J. (2013). Ideomotor perception modulates visuospatial cueing. Psychological Research, 77,528-539. [pdf]


Gozli, D.G. & Pratt, J. (2012). Attentional repulsion effect despite a colour-based control set. Visual Cognition, 20, 696-716. [pdf]

Gozli, D.G., West, G.L., & Pratt, J. (2012). Hand position alters vision by biasing processing through different visual pathways. Cognition, 124, 244-250. [pdf]


Gozli, D.G. & Brown, L.E. (2011). Agency and control for the integration of a virtual tool into the peripersonal space. Perception, 40, 1309-1319. [pdf]

Gozli, D.G. & Pratt, J. (2011). Seeing while acting: Hand movements can modulate attentional capture by motion onset. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 2448-2456. [pdf]


Gozli, D.G., Pollanen, M.,& Reynolds, M. (2009). The characteristics of writing environments for mathematics: Behavioral consequences and implications for software design and usability. LNAI: Intelligent Computer Mathematics, 310-324. [pdf]

[Google Scholar | ResearchGate]